Reflection on Project One Draft

1. I reviewed TMT vs Mauna Kea by Aaron Jatana. 

2. 

The essay was meant for a general audience, one that has at least some interest in photojournalism. It will be read by the class instructor and students in the class.

My readers will have an academic bias in that the essay will be read critically and given comments. I did not attempt to persuade or alter anyone's opinion but achieved the point with facts and quotes.

The readers could have a wide variety of values; professional integrity would probably be among the most highly regarded. The objectivity of the essay ties directly in with this value.

The essay doesn't need to provide much technical information. What limited terminology there is is self-explanatory. Ethics is the main idea of the essay, and photojournalism is a subset that doesn't require expert knowledge.

An open, inquisitive tone would be most effective, with nothing that is preachy or condescending. The tone seems to be the same throughout.