3 questions from last post:
1. Who were those criticizing Kevin Carter? I'd like to know so that I can study and understand their point of view. In this way the most honest depiction of this side of the controversy can be constructed.
2. The morality of shooting and publishing photos depicting violence, war, etc. being up for debate. These questions, since they are behind the criticism, need to be examined to give a wider picture of the issue.
3. The duty of the media to report such incidences. The debate about duty vs morality ought to be very interesting on its own merits. More than that, it will be used as a major point in the debate. What would happen if either won out?
No comments:
Post a Comment